There are a lot of different chess engines out there, and it can be hard to choose the right one. In this article, we’re going to pit two of the most popular chess engines against each other – stockfish and houdini. We’ll look at their strengths and weaknesses, and see which one comes out on top.


Stockfish is an open-source chess engine that became the reigning World Computer Chess Champion in 2014. It is also the most popular chess engine on the internet.

Stockfish vs Houdini

When it comes to chess, there are different levels of playing. Some people play just for fun, while others take it much more seriously. At the highest level, there are grandmasters who compete in tournaments for prizes.

There are also computer programs that can play chess at a very high level. In fact, there are now computer programs that can beat even the best human players.

One of the most popular chess programs is called “stockfish.” It is a free and open-source program that anyone can use.

“Houdini” is another chess program that is popular with experts. It is not free, but it is widely considered to be better than stockfish.

So, which one should you use? If you are just starting out, stockfish is a good option. It is free and it will help you to get better at chess. If you are already quite good at chess, then houdini might be a better option for you.


Stockfish has a few advantages over Houdini. Firstly, it is much faster. This means that it can explores more possibilities in the same amount of time, and so it can find stronger moves. Secondly, it is more aggressive, which means that it is more likely to find attacking moves that put the opponent under pressure. Finally, it has a slightly better evaluation function, which means that it values position slightly more than Houdini does.


There are several disadvantages to using stockfish as your primary chess engine. One is that it is not as well-rounded as some of the other popular chess engines such as houdini or komodo. This means that it may not be as effective in certain types of positions. Another disadvantage is that stockfish requires more processing power than some of the other chess engines, so it may not run as smoothly on older computers.


In a test between Houdini and Stockfish, Houdini was faster in almost all positions tested. With more than twice the number of positions tested, Houdini demonstrated a clear speed advantage in most cases. The average difference was about 15%.


Houdini is a popular chess engine used by experts and professionals. It is known for its ability to find creative solutions to chess puzzles and for its aggressive style of play. Stockfish is another popular chess engine that is known for its more strategic and positional approach to the game.


There are many benefits to using Houdini over stockfish. One key advantage is that Houdini is better at handling positions with a lot of pieces on the board. This is because Houdini uses more processing power to look at more moves ahead, whereas stockfish only looks at a few moves ahead.

Another advantage of Houdini is that it is better at finding tactical opportunities. This means that if there is a way to win material (pieces) or checkmate the opponent, Houdini is more likely to find it than stockfish.

Finally, Houdini has a much friendlier user interface than stockfish. This means that it is easier to use for chess beginners and those who are not used to using chess software.


Houdini can be a little too tame for some experts. One grandmaster said that ‘it lacks the courage to take practical chances’. In addition, its endgame tablebase play is not as strong as Stockfish’s.

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *